Legal Action: The Right Path for Businesses Facing Online Defamation

Thứ hai - 22/09/2025 16:51
In today’s digital environment, information spreads rapidly but is often hard to verify, creating fertile ground for fake news and defamation. For businesses, the damage goes beyond reputation—it can directly impact operations and employee welfare.

Many companies have recently fallen victim to online smear campaigns. In such cases, instead of engaging emotionally or responding on social media, the proper and sustainable solution is to pursue legal remedies such as lawsuits, administrative complaints, or criminal reports.

Civil lawsuits and compensation claims
Under Vietnam’s Civil Code 2015, legal entities whose reputation or honor is infringed have the right to file lawsuits in court. Businesses can demand corrections, public apologies, and compensation for damages. Strong evidence, often notarized by bailiffs, is crucial. Economic loss and reputational harm are also key grounds for compensation.

image 85

This approach shows respect for the law and avoids perceptions that large businesses are abusing their power to silence critics.

Administrative measures
Enterprises may submit complaints to specialized authorities such as the Department of Information and Communications or the Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information. Under the Cybersecurity Law, Decree 15/2020, and Decree 14/2022, individuals spreading false information can face fines from 10 to 15 million VND and be forced to remove the content.

Criminal proceedings for serious cases
If the defamation is organized and causes severe harm, businesses may file reports with investigative agencies. Violators can be prosecuted for “defamation” (Article 156 of the Penal Code) or “abuse of democratic freedoms” (Article 331). However, criminal cases usually require lengthy investigations and trials, so businesses should evaluate carefully.

International practices
Globally, many jurisdictions enforce strong protections. The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) obliges tech platforms to remove false information. Singapore’s POFMA law allows authorities to issue correction and takedown orders. In China, companies like Tesla and BYD have successfully sued individuals spreading fabricated claims, securing public apologies and compensation.

Case studies in Vietnam
Vietnamese courts have also recognized corporate victims of online defamation. In 2022, the People’s Court of An Nhon (Binh Dinh) ordered a Facebook user to apologize and compensate a local business. In 2025, the People’s Court of Thu Duc City sentenced Trương Thanh Tịnh (Mr. Lee) to nine months in prison for posting false and defamatory content that damaged a company and its owner.

Conclusion
In the complex digital era, legal action is the most effective tool for businesses to protect themselves. Beyond safeguarding their interests, companies help set standards for a more transparent and civil online environment, ensuring fair competition and accountability under the law.

Tổng số điểm của bài viết là: 0 trong 0 đánh giá

Click để đánh giá bài viết

  Ý kiến bạn đọc

LUẬT SƯ NGUYỄN THỊ KIM OANH: NGƯỜI TRUYỀN LỬA TÍN – LAN TỎA NIỀM TIN

Là Chủ tịch kiêm Tổng Giám đốc Công ty CP Luật Nguyễn (Luật Nguyễn Corp) và người sáng lập Cộng đồng Doanh nhân Tâm Giao (TGEC), bà không chỉ là một luật sư tài năng mà còn là một nhà lãnh đạo, một người kết nối, và một tấm gương sáng về sự cống hiến và trách nhiệm. Với triết lý sống “Trao chữ tín...

DỊCH VỤ LUẬT NGUYỄN
Thăm dò ý kiến

Bạn tìm thấy chúng tôi từ đâu ?

BANNER DOC
BANNER DOC
Bạn đã không sử dụng Site, Bấm vào đây để duy trì trạng thái đăng nhập. Thời gian chờ: 60 giây