According to the case file, on November 19, 2019, Do The M., a collaborator at B Insurance Co., Ltd., was not authorized to provide consulting or collect premiums from client Nguyen Ngoc A. However, M. nonetheless posed as an authorized representative, issued the company’s official receipt, and collected over VND 16 million from Mr. A.
M. then forged documents, including a “request to change policy details” and a “policy reinstatement form,” submitting VND 4 million to the company while embezzling the remaining VND 12 million.

Later, from October 2020 to 2022, despite having been dismissed from the company, M. continued pretending to be an insurance agent. He approached Mr. A. again, collecting more than VND 46 million in supposed annual premium payments, which he spent for personal use.
The prosecution charged M. with both “Abuse of trust to appropriate property” (Article 175(1)(a) of the 2015 Penal Code) and “Fraudulent appropriation of property” (Article 174(1) of the same code).
During trial, the prosecutor proposed a 30–36 month prison term and required M. to compensate Mr. A. over VND 46 million and the company more than VND 12 million.
The panel determined that M. had deliberately falsified insurance documents to steal company funds, satisfying all elements of abuse of trust. Furthermore, his later acts of impersonating an insurance agent and defrauding Mr. A. met the criteria for fraudulent appropriation of property.
All witness statements, physical evidence, and investigative documents corroborated M.’s confession, confirming that the prosecution’s charges were legally grounded and correctly identified the crimes.
The court stressed that M.’s actions were socially dangerous, violating others’ property rights and undermining public trust in the insurance industry. Despite having legal knowledge, M. acted out of greed and showed disregard for the law.
He had already been serving a 12-year prison sentence imposed by the People’s Court of Tay Ho District, Hanoi, for unrelated crimes committed later. Although the current case did not count as a prior conviction, it reflected his persistent disregard for the law.
Given that M. committed fraud multiple times, the court applied the aggravating factor under Article 52(1)(g) of the Penal Code. However, he was given some leniency for his truthful confession and remorse.
The court sentenced M. to:
12 months’ imprisonment for abuse of trust to appropriate property;
24 months’ imprisonment for fraudulent appropriation of property.
The total combined sentence was 3 years in prison, which, when added to his previous 12-year sentence, resulted in a total of 15 years of imprisonment.
M. was also ordered to repay over VND 46 million to Mr. A. and more than VND 12 million to B Insurance Co., Ltd.
Ý kiến bạn đọc
Những tin mới hơn
Những tin cũ hơn
Trong bất kỳ tổ chức nào, bên cạnh những người trực tiếp "ra trận" tạo nên doanh thu, còn có những "kiến trúc sư thầm lặng" xây dựng nên nền móng vững chắc. Tại Luật Nguyễn, người ta thường nhắc đến những luật sư dày dạn kinh nghiệm, nhưng ít ai biết về Nguyễn Thị Kim Hường – một trong những...
Bỏ thuế khoán: Đề xuất mới về kê khai thuế hộ kinh doanh
Bộ Chính trị ra Chỉ thị tăng cường lãnh đạo giám định tư pháp, định giá tài sản
Lý do không áp dụng biểu thuế cho kỳ tính thuế năm 2025
Biểu thuế TNCN 5 bậc, thuế suất 35%: Đã tối ưu cho người lao động?
Ngành Thuế Ra Mắt Công Cụ Tự Kê Khai Trực Tuyến
Khởi tố Đoàn Văn Sáng vì tội giết người ở Lạng Sơn
Quỹ Phòng chống thiên tai đối với Doanh nghiệp.Bắt buộc hay Tự nguyện?
SJC gold price soars to nearly VND 133 million/tael, $900 premium over global market
Gold price gap between SJC and global market narrows by VND 6 million
Foreigners Seeking a Vietnamese Driver’s License: What You Must Meet